Talk:The Major Treasure Room

"The treasures" paragraph

Does the table work? Or is it too difficult to get a proper understanding of? Pjär 23:39, 7 April 2008 (CEST)

I think it work quite fine. However, sometimes there are short mentions of these object and their stories, these mentions sometimes definitely contradicts other stories, or might contradict them, i.e. in "Alexander's Diamond Cup", it is said that Emperor Joonkar once was the owner of Alexander's Diamond Cup, this might contradict other versions of the cup's story. It might be a good idea to include these stories in the table at the origin part, then there could be created a Comments part, where the background is explained. I am, however, doubtful of the possibility of creating such a table since it would become quite large. Karl MAN 3 13:21, 8 April 2008 (CEST)

Hmm.. good point. As you suggest, it might cause the template to grow to extremes. I'm thinking that we leave minor differences (such as the one you mention) out of the table, but naturally include them in the article about the specific object. Would that work? Pjär 15:50, 8 April 2008 (CEST)

New pages

Cleopatra, Julius Caesar, Tristan and Isolde, Noah, William Shakespeare, Nefertiti, Homer. On these one should try to create pages or simply give wikipedia link? Paramjitmann (talk) 13:30, 10 November 2018 (CET)

For William Shakespeare we need page. I am not sure for the rest of list. Delboj (talk) 13:41, 10 November 2018 (CET)