I think it looks quite okay. The cover is the first thing you see of a new magazine, so it's more chronological with this layout. --MiGi (talk) 19:30, 6 December 2015 (CET)
- That was my thinking too. Also, we had cover info separated from the actual images with the old structure. Andreas (talk) 19:36, 6 December 2015 (CET)