PhantomWiki:Bandar Village: Difference between revisions
(→Co-Produced Newspapers: NEW TOPIC Cover) |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Any idea? [[User:Karl MAN|Karl MAN]] ([[User talk:Karl MAN|talk]]) 19:14, 7 November 2015 (CET) | Any idea? [[User:Karl MAN|Karl MAN]] ([[User talk:Karl MAN|talk]]) 19:14, 7 November 2015 (CET) | ||
:The issue is two-fold: firstly how the artcles about this should be structured, secondly how we should write in the story articles that the story has been reprinted in the newspaper (if there is no longer any difference at all between two papers, should they still both be mentioned?). [[User:Karl MAN|Karl MAN]] ([[User talk:Karl MAN|talk]]) 16:42, 8 November 2015 (CET) | :The issue is two-fold: firstly how the artcles about this should be structured, secondly how we should write in the story articles that the story has been reprinted in the newspaper (if there is no longer any difference at all between two papers, should they still both be mentioned?). [[User:Karl MAN|Karl MAN]] ([[User talk:Karl MAN|talk]]) 16:42, 8 November 2015 (CET) | ||
== Fantomen covers == | |||
How should a cover be named? I have always thought that Fantomen covers were to be be named "Fantomen etc.." even if it was first published in Norway or any of the other countries which ''Fantomen'' was co-produced with because the main work was done in Sweden. Now we have the case of [[Fantomet 9/2015]] which was published August 20, while [[Fantomen 20/2015]] was published September 24. Thus we have the article [[Fantomet 9/2015 cover]]. Should we do it like this? The co-production has changed a bit since Fantomet is nowadays published monthly. [[User:Karl MAN|Karl MAN]] ([[User talk:Karl MAN|talk]]) 14:49, 17 November 2015 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 15:49, 17 November 2015
Welcome to PhantomWiki's own Bandar Village! Here is the place to have discussions and put up question that are too general to be posted on any talk page. Please note that discussions concerning individual articles are to be hold in that article's talk page.
When starting a new discussion, please add it at the bottom of the page, and use a valid title.
As always when on PhantomWiki, remember to keep a friendly tone, and to always assume good faith.
| Archived discussions
|
|---|
|
|
Co-Produced Newspapers
I have recently come across a couple of examples of co-produced newspapers. In some cases, there are simply different editions of the same newspaper, but with different titles. Sometimes, There are to separate newspapers that are joined together, with diferent editions, eventually becoming only one edition. See LV., LK., VP., Folkbladet, and Östgöten which illustrates two examples of this.
HOW are we to make articles about this? Separate for the different editions (as I have done)? Separate articles for the different newspapers, even for the part of the publication of dailies after they have become one newspaper?
Any idea? Karl MAN (talk) 19:14, 7 November 2015 (CET)
- The issue is two-fold: firstly how the artcles about this should be structured, secondly how we should write in the story articles that the story has been reprinted in the newspaper (if there is no longer any difference at all between two papers, should they still both be mentioned?). Karl MAN (talk) 16:42, 8 November 2015 (CET)
Fantomen covers
How should a cover be named? I have always thought that Fantomen covers were to be be named "Fantomen etc.." even if it was first published in Norway or any of the other countries which Fantomen was co-produced with because the main work was done in Sweden. Now we have the case of Fantomet 9/2015 which was published August 20, while Fantomen 20/2015 was published September 24. Thus we have the article Fantomet 9/2015 cover. Should we do it like this? The co-production has changed a bit since Fantomet is nowadays published monthly. Karl MAN (talk) 14:49, 17 November 2015 (CET)