User talk:Karl MAN: Difference between revisions

From PhantomWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
:What it actually says is (PART ONE) in minuscle letters under the title, indicating that it is the first in a story arc, in [[The Phantom 1594 (Frew)]], the same was done and we have no Part One in the title name there. Also, there are no Part one at chroniclechamber.com. Perhaps a further discussion is needed at Bandar Village about how to interpret Egmont titles published by Frew, but I interpret it in this case that I changed it to the correct title and that the part one thing was merely a short disclaimer, informing the buyers that its the first part of a story arc. [[User:Karl MAN|Karl MAN]] 19:11, 25 March 2011 (CET)
:What it actually says is (PART ONE) in minuscle letters under the title, indicating that it is the first in a story arc, in [[The Phantom 1594 (Frew)]], the same was done and we have no Part One in the title name there. Also, there are no Part one at chroniclechamber.com. Perhaps a further discussion is needed at Bandar Village about how to interpret Egmont titles published by Frew, but I interpret it in this case that I changed it to the correct title and that the part one thing was merely a short disclaimer, informing the buyers that its the first part of a story arc. [[User:Karl MAN|Karl MAN]] 19:11, 25 March 2011 (CET)
::Ok, but in this case maybe next story will be titled as "The Legend of Rahotep" (Part Two) [[User:Delboj4|Delboj4]] 19:24, 25 March 2011 (CET)
::Ok, but in this case maybe next story will be titled as "The Legend of Rahotep" (Part Two) [[User:Delboj4|Delboj4]] 19:24, 25 March 2011 (CET)
:::I don't think so, at [http://www.karileppanencomics.fi/english%20next%20phantomwork.htm Kari Leppänen's webpage] the next story is named "The Legend of Rahotep, Part II: The Hidden Hand of Death". The undertitle would be enough, we previously had the case with [[The Mysterious Cave]] and [[The Mysterious Cave, Part Two: Ch'Gaan's Curse]]. Either they do that, or they'll go for the undertitle completely is my guess. There might be worth discussing how to name hte Frew versions of the titles at Bandar Village though, there is already a discussion there about whether we should write Part 1 or Part One, though no one comments. [[User:Karl MAN|Karl MAN]] 19:34, 25 March 2011 (CET)

Revision as of 20:34, 25 March 2011

Välkommen, kul att du hittade hit! Member 7 07:56, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

Interesting, thanks for checking that. Member 7 19:06, 13 January 2008 (CET)

New daily story

I got the title from Phantom Phorum, and I believe it comes directly from Paul Ryan and/or Tony DePaul. Andreas 13:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Frew 1596

I don't understand why you changed link here [1], plase see cover of [2], part one is printed on cover. Delboj4 14:02, 24 March 2011 (CET)

What it actually says is (PART ONE) in minuscle letters under the title, indicating that it is the first in a story arc, in The Phantom 1594 (Frew), the same was done and we have no Part One in the title name there. Also, there are no Part one at chroniclechamber.com. Perhaps a further discussion is needed at Bandar Village about how to interpret Egmont titles published by Frew, but I interpret it in this case that I changed it to the correct title and that the part one thing was merely a short disclaimer, informing the buyers that its the first part of a story arc. Karl MAN 19:11, 25 March 2011 (CET)
Ok, but in this case maybe next story will be titled as "The Legend of Rahotep" (Part Two) Delboj4 19:24, 25 March 2011 (CET)
I don't think so, at Kari Leppänen's webpage the next story is named "The Legend of Rahotep, Part II: The Hidden Hand of Death". The undertitle would be enough, we previously had the case with The Mysterious Cave and The Mysterious Cave, Part Two: Ch'Gaan's Curse. Either they do that, or they'll go for the undertitle completely is my guess. There might be worth discussing how to name hte Frew versions of the titles at Bandar Village though, there is already a discussion there about whether we should write Part 1 or Part One, though no one comments. Karl MAN 19:34, 25 March 2011 (CET)