Talk:I Classici dell'Avventura – L'Uomo Mascherato 30 (Fratelli Spada)

I initially reviewed the story "Diana fra i pescicani" as being "badly redrawn over the Wilson McCoy's art". However, this sentence was perhaps too assertive. Now I don't think that the work is something to consider like "a story drawn by an unknown Fratelli Spada artist", because all the original panels are exactly there. It is just that the lines of each drawing are thicker and less precise than the lines of the real strips. At the time, it seems that only an old and poorly Nerbini printing of those daily strips was available for Spada editor. In such a specific way, I believe we can still say that it remains the story drawn by Wilson McCoy. At least for eighty percent versus twenty… If someone has the issue, it would be interesting to hear other opinions. Alain03 15:15, 16 January 2012 (CET)

In that case, we could keep link for original story, but then Wilson McCoy couldn't be mentioned as artist. Similiar situation is with stories in L'Uomo Mascherato #29 - redrawn by Enzo Carretti. For edited (in Italian "lucidata") stories, when there are too many changes, stories should get own links and refers to original version as remake. If there are original and new added panels, then only mention beside original artist also Italian artist and keep link for original story. I think there is not other solutions. Delboj4 16:02, 16 January 2012 (CET)